Katz and Chard (2000) stress the importance of choosing a topic as a major consideration for project work. They note
In terms of thinking about young learners, it is important to consider how we might go about choosing a topic for project work with our students.
Questions:
- What are some potential topics that might spark the interests of young children?
- How (and where can we locate ideas about the lives of young children that might help to inform us of potential topics for a project?
Following the model outlined in Engaging Children's Minds: The Project Approach, students separated into two groups of 5 and two groups of 4. They were provided with a post-it notes, markers, and 2 large sheets of paper.
The students went to work immediately. The process of
brainstorming allowed students to think through ideas collectively, to share
their own experiences, and attend to nuances.
A question about representation
provided an opportunity for Kyle and Beth to think about what it means to
represent and to be represented…
“How does the Nittany Lion
represent us? “
“Wait, don’t we all ready have that
question?”
“No, we have how do we represent
the Nittany Lion?”
“Aren’t they the same question?”
“NO! They are two TOTALLY different
questions!"
The familiarity with the topic and the expertise of
different students helped to propel their ideas. For example, Caitlin and Jess have great connections because
of their participation in dance team/ cheerleading (respectively) and these
connections showed themselves in their choices for guest speakers. Audrey has
experience with photo-mosaics and suggested that we use images to make a mosaic
of the Penn State Lion. Kyle opened up thinking about sequencing lessons by
suggesting that we use a project on representation as the basis for our mosaic,
nesting individual representation into a larger concept of community
representation.
| Add caption |
"During phase one, the teacher helps the children to build a
shared perspective on the topic and to formulate a set of question that will
guide their investigation" (Katz and Chard, p.70).
Once the students had completed their graphic organizers,
they were instructed to consider some overarching questions and to also
consider non-print modes of inquiry. As a means of expanding the student’s
ability to think outside traditional modes of knowledge production, I
instructed them to consider activities that might be appropriate for young
children. This suggestion opened up lines of thinking that expanded the use of
modalities. We were not only thinking as teachers, but also as learners of the
topic. We merged into a large
group discussion that allowed us to share questions and modalities of thinking
to explore those questions. As a group, we considered how they overlapped and
might be combined. A final list of questions was formulated.
Why are we the Nittany Lions and how does it represent us?
How do we, as Penn Stater's, represent ourselves as Nittany Lions?
What is the significance of the general history of the Nittany Lion and PSU?
What are similarities and differences between real lions and "nittany lions"?
How do people, past and present, shape what the Nittany Lion means today?
How have the responsibilities and traditions of the lion mascot developed over time?
The students articulated that they found the process fairly
easy, no real difficulties. They were able to note that there is always a
balance between possibility and practicality and that there are limitations to
what we might be able to accomplish within the given parameters of a classroom.
There were some small disagreements about final formulations
of questions. Caitlin suggested a final question “How have the responsibilities
and traditions of the lion mascot developed over time?” Kyle felt as if this
was a sub-question to one of the other overarching questions. Caitlin and
Danielle stood their ground to explain how it was different. And Beth was
skeptical on using Lion Amabassadors as guest speakers, wondering what they
could bring to the project that would be interesting. Although the lion
ambassadors could provide us with great historical information, would it be
interesting to sit in a classroom and listen to them? I tried to point out that
this is an important thing to remember when planning projects for young
children (and ourselves).
As the facilitator, probably the hardest part of the process
(for me) is the discomfort of disagreement. I do not want students to feel
“shut down” in the process and I want people to realize that every idea is
worthy of being put on the table. I wish I had posed some questions about how
we can work through dis/agreement , how we can listen to ideas with openness,
and how we can agree on solutions
that prioritize the community as a whole. These seem like important processes
for developing collaborations between teachers…and collaborations between
teachers and students. After all,
not every idea, every activity, and every speaker is going to make it into the
final draft of the project but the process itself can provide valuable tools
for learning how to listen carefully and find value in each idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment